11. Motives

The theory of Motives was proposed by Grothendieck as an ideal cohomological theory for varieties and schemes. Recent work by Levine, Suslin and Voevodsky gives a construction of an almost final version of this theory. Another such construction has been given by Nori. One problem is proving the equivalence of these constructions. Another way of approaching this is to demonstrate the Hard Lefschetz theorem for these theories.

A study of these and related problems has been undertaken by the author in collaboration with G. Ravindra and Gautham Dayal (of the Chennai Mathematical Institute).

Using Saito’s theory of Hodge Modules we are now able to combine the arithmetic conjectures of Bloch and Beilinson with the analytic theory of cycles to make the following unified conjecture. (Similar work has also been recently done by Akasura and Saito independently).

Fix an embedding of Q the algebraic closure of Q, the field of rational numbers into C the field of complex numbers. Let S be any variety over Q; Saito has defined the category of Mixed Hodge Modules over S (actually, we will only be concerned with a subcategory called the category of admissible variations of mixed hodge structures). If XS is an flat family, Saito constructs the Mixed Hodge Modules Ri(X∕S) on S corresponding to the cohomologies of the fibres. Now, if X is any variety over C, there is a filtered collection of families XS so that X is its inverse limit. The arithmetic conjectures of Bloch and Beilinson can now be formulated into a conjecture for varieties over C as follows:

grpFCHq (X )Q `→  lim Extp(Q (- p),R2q-p(X ∕S))

where the F denotes the filtration of Bloch on the Chow group, the limit is over the above filtered collection and the Ext groups are in Satio’s mixed hodge module category over S.

Finally, an important aspect of the the theory of motives is the construction of concrete examples where this theory can be verified (in the absence of the complete theory). We have constructed such typical examples and are in the process of verifying all the predictions regarding algebraic cycles that are made by the theory of motives in this cases. In particular, we are verifying that all known examples of non-trivial cycles over C can be put in the framework of the above conjecture. We have also constructed examples to show that conjectured constructions of Ext2 due to M. Green are insufficient; this has already been done earlier by C. Voisin but our examples are somewhat simpler than hers.